Chastise, chastised, chastising, chastises, chastisable, chastisement, chastiser, and chastity (noun), chasuble (noun), also chaste (adjective), chaster, chastest, chastely, chasteness, chasten (transitive verb), chastened, chastening, chastens

Yet, this emotional process is quite prevalent in our media invalidating its value. Nevertheless, we all seem to want to perform this emotion, and as an example, it will be used on those higher in power that oppress those without power, so the chastisements begin, but are they valid chastising?

It would be more in the interpretation of the expression and visible frustration detected, along with other detectable states inferred that would determine if those who seemingly chastise others are really feeling envy, and how envy works in the mind is complicated.

Those who are instantly and aggressively reacting, are using envy, and how does that work?

This is in relation to all the words surrounding this one and their lexeme, as in the word chaste, which is a form of perceived moral pure thought but in reality, abject conduct. This abject conduct is envy at one of its purest forms, and the previous, past tense, or establishment of knowledge whether correct or not, the corrections may be made abjectly, and a form of reproof or restraint, and a hood over the truth is intended from the original perception.

What is the truth? It is the fact that this emotional reaction is a valid disease, and a form of fixation on oneself or group ideologies including the physicalism of shinning temples, and the knowledge being used or believed that overrides all ethic boundaries, as exemplified by our current onslaught in the world over others, their beliefs, and literally everything they are in the form of wars with the illusion they are the enemy. In the confused mind, they are chastised in every breath.

To begin to understand why certainty locks into place into the mind is still a mystery to some degree, but one should consider envy as being involved. It is often thought that envy is when you want something someone else has, but it also can be involved inside the mind in a way of envious irrational greed that will justify itself.

George Gurdjieff, in his teachings to P.D. Ouspensky in the book, "In Search of the Miraculous" stated that morality is merely self-suggestion. One morality can always very easily contradict and completely deny another. G referred to morality as consisting of "buffers".

"The more moral a man is, the more immoral does he think other moral people."

This is reflected in people who control others, as in the prison system in America, now the largest on the planet. These immoral people, as the chastiser would express it, need to be punished, and this will purify them, and make the whole again. This is even done to whole nations with the help of the egotistical expressions spewed by echo chamber news people who no longer seem real if you noticed, but more buffered.

Prisons in America do not purify people, as the punishment is forced upon them and they have not been allowed to actually perform this task themselves, as others have taken it to task for them, a clear violation of conscience. A perfect example is the country of Finland who rehabilitates those who have committed unlawful acts back into society, and Finland expresses conscience in doing so. In Japan, those who have committed unlawful acts are given the opportunity to develop remorse through their associations and family being allowed to talk in their behalf, and literally beg for forgiveness. Unfortunately, if they go beyond this into a Japanese prison, the education becomes controlling and militaristic. In America, there is no rehabilitation whatsoever, and it is mostly because moral has an abjection or buffer that blocks conscience, or the essence of it.

It makes no sense to chastise anyone as you are not purer than anyone else. In wearing a chasuble, you may just be hiding the truth with a falsehood. Abstinence is more about controlling emotions that the actual physical chaste personification, and focus away from the mind in an attempt to control it.

It is not a chastisement to infer knowledge about the buffers used and believed that alter humanity.

chaste: morally pure - indefinable
chastity: Condition of moral purity - indefinable
chasten: to correct the condition abjectly - definable as envy of oneself, reflection disease
conscience: definable, see definition

Conscience has nothing to do with morality or sex.

Morality has everything to do with the chastisement of itself.

Solving chastised thinking:

There is no perfect answer, as any would be somewhat suggestive. There are however questions.

Why is the pathos forgotten and pity put in its place?

Why is not the life given considered as somewhat pre-destined meaning how could you blame someone for it?

Why must we considered to abject people when they had no say in the results?
(In reference to being born)

Why is the person signified from the generation when the generation is required for the person?
(In reference to self-importance, and self-suggestiveness signifying different than or better than.)

We have to agree that the harm done to people is felt personally, as well as generations as in family, and the latter is used as an excuse for the first, invalidating creation or the love for it.

Why is shame packed up and shoved in the closet never to be seen or felt by some people?
See sociopathy

Deuteronomy 8:5
Thou shalt also consider in thine heart, that, as a man chasteneth his son, so the LORD thy God chasteneth thee.

Psalm 69:10
When I wept, and chastened my soul with fasting, that was to my reproach.

Comment: Each human birth may have the potential to grow a soul if nurtured correctly, otherwise you may just be eaten by the beast.

R. Mark Sink  2007/9/6