Claim, claimed, claiming, claims, claimable, claimer, claimant, clairvoyance, clairvoyant

Claim is to demand a right to many things, such as property in the physical world, and ideas in the mind which may be used in the physical world to determine the first. Ideas can even become predicted as an aversion to the pretense.

The word [claim] and its synonyms brings this pretense and title to ideas and property presented in the physical perceived world. We pretend we own and have title to what we think and can physically attain, while our existence is temporary. In other words, we assume ownership here, but only while here. This becomes abused as a form of will, and often thought of as inheritance based only on the physical reality.

To claim can also be interpreted as a request upon others for the right to privacy. So here, the claimant is requesting the right to be able to think in one's own terms. These thoughts are perceived with one's own free will. This is where the champion is hidden in the straw.

To separate thoughts in the mind can be extremely difficult when one has already made claims upon ideas assumed to be correct, or believed. These claims begin at a very young age, and are fixed in place in the mind of the user. In order to descramble these thoughts into forms that were meant to enlighten the user, the aversion is implemented by society to keep us claiming and clamoring for the physical world.

The clairvoyant is a key sign of this phenomena appearing in our thoughts. The aversion from the power of the perceived freedom is focused forward in time by perceiving either activities that have already occurred, or may occur, and matched to the user interface, this being your curiosity of which is manipulated. Our perception of time is beyond our thinking it seems, so this area is quite abused.

The user interface represents what we perceive as actually factual, and what we can measure to provide physical proof in ideas we claim as true, and then we react to them in expression of life. Curiosity is easily activated with any perception related to time outside one's own measurable reality or space. Any matching anomaly related to our existent active interface is measured, and perceived as a claim, when it has just become an anomaly that instant.

Even though these anomalies live very close to what is perceived as coincidence, no one can truly separate them as measurable. The clairvoyant's pretense is a form of title that cannot be measured completely, rather it is measured by matching the physical interface system. No one can prove the coincidence, so if one can generate and match them, one uses them as a negative force.

Although curiosity is thought to be the primer emotion initially activated, there are many more emotions at work that have pretense, or even prejudice applied to the interface application in your thinking processes. It would be more beneficial to understand why a coincidence exists, and let curiosity work the idea more soundly, then to focus back into the champion claim of the measuring stick of time applied to the measuring stick in the mind. New age thinking plays into this realm of thinking and gets lost at the same time.

The clairvoyant is attuning the negative reflection allowing some access as claimed in the form of anomalies that are matched to coincidences. The channeled information is predicated when it should be presented as anomaly only for further study. So one who channels is not necessarily clairvoyant, instead they have achieved knowledge of a measurable access. Once the access of information is achieved, it can be presented in a myriad of ways determined by the user. The users reflections and interpretations are a critical equation in the claim or anomaly to be evaluated.

We know that claiming our right to live this life is done from birth. We cannot perceive what that claim is when born, it must be implemented by our teachers. Once the claim is perceived, it becomes the title of the day when much more discernment is necessary for proper human evolution.

If we perceive we can trick time to match our world, we are only pretending that we understand the coincidence by cleverly matching it to our world, while averting the sound volition at the same time. Curiosity and time seem locked, as we are pulled through it wondering where it went when it may have went nowhere, and our coincidences are connected to our imagination reflected off our own interface into the physical system.

This constant interaction and claim to live and love a life, [because I seem to be stuck here until I die perception], cannot be considered an anomaly, but it is a coincidence, wouldn't you agree? In this case, there are many more coincidences than ever before that you may now perceive. If you claim them, you transform them into anomalies and hope they are coincidences.

So the coincidence is the natural way you are meant to interact with the system, and any claim to it will be expressed as an anomaly. When one can perceive oneself without backfeed from the reflection, a cathexis is formed of the two. This is also expressed in retention as in stepping up in the evolutionary scale. Curiosity is our physical connection to our life energy and everything we perceive, and we must know that emotions cannot be erased mechanically in the mind without physical manipulation. We must begin to realize how emotions and intelligence are bonded, and we seem to constantly focus away from the balance in the center, which may open a new door or staircase in our reality.

It is envy that is doing the claiming mostly in our minds and would hope you don't notice. So how do we claim anything without having a system that requires it? Our interface with this reality some would say is not a coincidence, but that is applying the system to the answer, and a pretense. The pretenses must be removed for the coincidence of life to successfully evolve. If we assume everything in the past as the [way it is], we are in fact modifying the habitat and expression away from any original intrinsic intentions that correlate to natures balance with earth, plant, and man.

Here again, our perception of time is warped from the backfeed concerning habits and exposure [application changes] to the interface system. Our fast-paced retrieval away from the cathexis practice in application processing has us headed into extinction based on observed interaction. Seemingly, this would increase the chance for anomalies to be perceived in an attempt to balance the system by highlighting the coincidences using the pure emotion curiosity as the help program. Only curiosity can begin the anomaly, and only the anomaly can be the coincidence before it is perceived.

By the time you have perceived it, time has tricked you, or it seems. The derivatives of the word claim suggest classification, which presents anomalies by the millions where humans must shout to be heard among the data while the clairvoyant sees envy as a tool of sorts showing coincidences in the mix. We must not be fooled into thinking coincidences are a part of the interface perceived, but a part of why it exists in the first place where there are no anomalies.

Claim only the ability to perceive anything at all, and begin to understand the interface system, not only the physical side, but also the mental side and balance thereof. Only careful application changes are needed otherwise great danger exists. The shark was one who has been carefully adopting their claim on the original system. The shark also balances their exposure as a form of function, and man has done the exact opposite and expects to survive? It is obvious man was never meant to eat like a shark but think like one. Our evolution presents exactly the opposite in the form of interface into this system as a shark in the form of aggression geometrically into it, and thus unbalancing the entire evolution that was more than a coincidence, for it was more than an anomaly, and more than time.

The shark has not made a claim to the system as a whole, only man has assumed the ability to even discern the shark and why it would evolve. In turn, we become an eating machine upon the planet in order to claim every inch of it in aversion to the truth, as envy would have it.

R. Mark Sink  2007/3/10