Coincidence, coincidences, coincident, coincidental, also coincide,
coincides, coincided, coinciding
Coincidence is the relative factor of interface into the
physical reality. We have the ability to think through
this application process creating an anomaly as perceived. We
use many emotions to process the data perceived, so it becomes
complicated in discerning the
perception.
Our relative factor is occupying this space and having the
ability to perceive the interaction through a lineage program
called time, which seems to cause more problems in the system. We
immediately begin claiming anomalies in a coincidental way, and
presented as knowledge, yet doubt is hidden within the whole of
the processing.
The word coincide is more on target to the true meaning of
coincidence. If humans and their interface with this reality
would coincide, or become equal, balance might be achieved. Man
has somehow preferred to focus on the actual perception
accomplished from the application only.
Our aversion to this knowledge accomplished through our
interface into this world assumes this world is the interface in
complicity where more than half of the system is amiss.
According to studies we assume about 10% of our interface.
Our interface into this world coincides with the application of
which earth is included, but should not be perceived as the
whole of the system, but as a reason to equal the two in balance
while carefully adapting the system for use.
Our abilities in this world to think [volition
and choice] are limitless as knowledge
is attained at any level once discernment begins to perceive the
core application processing. These applications are emotions and they
allows us to enjoy our existence while at the same time, they
can just as easily backfeed the system. Emotions should coincide
with intelligence, and here are two example in extreme terms.
The user who is a fireman practices the focus in intelligence
interface balance. The one who claims to be a psychiatrist
focuses the user on emotional interface balance. The first user does
not fear because emotions have been adapted, and the latter may fear everything
because knowledge is being adapted and they more often do not
coincide the levels of perception.
Is this relation an anomaly or a coincidence? It is only an anomaly if we
make a claim to it. If no claim is made in the sense of
knowledge that is fixed, then the coincidence comes to life in
the form of applied knowledge, and not accepted knowledge.
When first attaining knowledge, no coincidence seems evident,
only anomalies. Knowledge can then become quite frightening as
fixed knowledge is removed most commonly held in
place by hope and pretensions of the past. Coincidences usually
don't appear until after this has occurred.
Our inner
envy or
love with our software if you will, is balancing the
power of it, and all the flavors presented. This power we
possess to observe and collect information, similar to the way
computers are beginning to do, is only a step in evolution
according to the main application installed on the user system. We
breathe, sleep, drink, and eat, but by some coincidence we also
think.
Our thinking must coincide not only with the perceived reality
[intelligence], but also the [spiritual] reality, which seems to
be intrinsic in our nature, or as a sign earth exists coinciding
us as some sort of tutorial showing emotions on different levels
of application through expression directed at us.
Once these applications adapt, anomaly feedback may occur in the
form of déjà vu which could be considered a
curiosity help
program alert forcing inner thought and
awareness of the system.
R. Mark Sink 2007/3/10
|
