Explicit, explicitly, explicitness
Explicit is expression without
implication, and a
clear definition without bias. Explicitness is
censored in
all expression, especially books, articles, and professions. One
who expresses more honestly will infer dialogue in
interpretations that is not necessarily conclusions, but well
thought out analysis of what is considered not explicit
in the observation or review of information.
The perceived lividness of some information and knowledge
observed with sexual connotations is often associated with
explicitness in physical expression, as exampled by nudism
observed.
Other examples of explicit are forthright and
unreserved in formulation, and synonymously the words,
categorical, definite, and specific, along with express are
mentioned.
Categorical is considered exceptional work in expression
and worthy of citing and reference. Definition brings out
distinction and noticeable limitations with the expression.
Specific brings a bit of intent
that shows the work rather than the expression itself. All
together, it is all inside your head processing all the
information given to you and presented as knowledge for you in
many cases.
The dictionary gives the antonym of explicit as ambiguous
meaning ambiguity is a more open interpretation of
knowledge, and the loosening of facts associated with the
knowledge expressed. Information obtained that is ambiguous is
not necessarily evil, yet may lead to powering up
curiosity for further exploration and learning. Some good
examples are UFO's and crop circles. When explicitly researched,
and inference to legitimacy is expressed even though still
ambiguously received, disinfo implications abound in formulated
retributions to the expressions.
The censor finds the hints on the surface of these messages, and
must seek balance between the lines of what is really expressed,
which is referred to as part of 'the work'. This route is not easy and
commonly stepped over which clogs the arteries of knowledge
available seekers must sort through. It does no good to read
books unless they are explicitly expressed and researched. This
means there is work involved and critical thinking or you end up
just being a banana brain.
Those who express explicitly must love knowledge and seem
to seek creation in the right path, and maybe the only path that
has true distinction without the dreaded opinions, conjectures,
and piles of guesswork holding up the tent of
belief.
R. Mark Sink 2007/8/7
|
