Immanent, immanence, immanency (nouns), immanently (adverb), immanentism (noun), immanentist (adjective & noun), and immaterial (adjective), immaterially (adverb), immaterialness (noun), immaterialism (noun), immaterialist (adjective & noun), immateriality (noun), immaterialities (plural noun), immaterialize (transitive verb)
Included in discussion: material (noun), materialism (noun), physicalism (noun)

Immanent is that which remains in context to all things immaterial in nature. The word imminent is not the same, and refers to predictability about what is probable to happen in time. If you say, the Pope is immanent, it could be perceived two ways. One way, you perceive there is the materialistic presence of dignity or another, that he is an immanent ruler in the position of power he obtained.

It is important to note that immanence is everywhere in everything, in other words, something immaterial came before everything we perceive, and you and everything else remain. According to scientists, the universe had a creation, and in the millionths of seconds immanently expressed, there was hydrogen, and hydrogen knew that when it found helium, they would change. The question to ask, is why?

We can't expect that the elements are just random chance, hydrogen had a reason, and obviously a purpose. Samuel Johnson argued about the use of immaterial and the connotations with being synonymous with irrelevant as it was easy to loose the context. When the word immaterial is used for subject matter, this is completely different than speaking of the spirit world.

The arguments over immanence really can be explained by studying it psychologically using a bit of geometric thinking. First, the universe grew outward in a sort of ellipsoid shape, but this was from a very small point in space. This should be enough to make anyone wonder how small can we see, and if hydrogen and other atoms hold many more secrets that we just can see yet.

The separation of material and immaterial can be confusing no doubt, but in a spiritual sense only, everything we take part of in this universe is either alive or not alive, and this is the distinction that should be recognized in helping to understand perception of this reality.

The Earth is full of life, the very first life coming out of the sea, and the presence of the sea is still in question as to how it originally formed. One thing for sure, hydrogen was heavily involved. Scientists have already stated that we are part of the stars or sometimes referred to as space dust.

What ever we are, hydrogen, helium, and light hold the essence of life for our existence. It is the relationship between these three elements that seemingly remain the core of life. Starting at this level, say the Big Bang, it is very difficult to determine the difference between material and immaterial, is it not?

Everything we make that is from the Earth, is not alive, including computers so far. So the material world is a metaphor that combines what we have made, and what has transpired in life on its own. This would include the observer as part of that material world.

In classifying the world as material, this is a bad habit to get into. The world and universe is a combination of that which is alive and that which is not alive. That which is alive surely is not immaterial, yet wars make it so and so do houses, and cities follow. The growth of humans and their style of living kills Earth by covering large areas of it, removing the food source that is capable of emanating from the surface. This sacred space is the area where sunlight is available.

Since the power of God was there before the hydrogen that just happen to be handy in the Big Bang, wouldn't it be blasphemy to label those who support the pathos created by God? Down through the centuries, they were often referred to as Pagans. Yet, at the very same time, another separate group of people were focused on the immaterial elements, and the Pagans were seemingly focused on the material.

The material reference here is the same as before, including two elements, alive and not alive. It was the alive part that Pagans were concerned with. It was the classification of the word material which cleverly hid one half of this element for years in the minds of perception. The reasoning for this is simple, Pagans could be classified into many categories that were physical in nature. In using the word physical, this covered the fact that the material in the world has many facades to consider.

Everyone has heard the statements of Pagans and those who were not of the official current day Judaism or Christianity sector as cult worshippers which was supposed to be a physical connection that everyone understood as material. Actually, the word cult is short for cultivation of Earth by the beasts who Christians unknowingly support. In this context, Christians become opposed to God and the essence of life or support of it. The word immanent sits right on top of immaterial in the dictionary and they are closely associated in meaning. Are Christians telling us that his immanency is a cult worshipper?

Christians stick to the material world, and use the Sun, the Moon, Earth, Wind, and Fire to unknowingly label those who understand all these things hold the essence of God, just as we do in space dust, or God dust, if you want to call it that. All this has been created for us to oversee, yet Christians and others live on the Earth as beasts, and act like beasts in expression using emotions that are negative and help create chaos for other life forms identical to them.

There are many people who believe in the spirit world or fourth-dimension, and this is immaterial in nature. How on Earth can Christians claim that those Pagans who beat their drums do not associated their feelings with the very source that Christians also want to claim, but in the fray, Christians and others attempt to separate them by using clever metaphors that confuse dialogue between people resulting in literal pathos alteration and belief?

Both sources as it stands presently, for the most part, are unattainable in this realm, so one side creates the idea that this will be obtained after your dead, and this immediately solves many propaganda problems. The other side does not fall for this false story completely, as they know that after your dead, the rules change. Those rules that apply here, may not be applicable anymore. so they are more interested in seeing what can be done while we are capable of doing it under rules that we already can learn and apply here. These laws are part of the laws of God who was there before the hydrogen. There is also the issue of bringing knowledge forward fairly in the process, but homo sapiens change this and begin to hide knowledge so that not only others can be manipulated, but all life on Earth can be manipulated and cultivated for the beasts.

Of course, once the Earth has been cultivated completely, the beasts will have completed their mission, the Earth will remove the life on Earth, and begin anew. Those who claimed that they could achieve the next dimension after they were dead became space dust. Those who sought to learn otherwise had a chance to see the next world, some made it, some didn't. The ones who didn't make it, may never know what happened, and this thought is often overlooked.

Immaterial is here, but it is also not here. As before, immanency is everywhere. This accounts for both the immaterial and the material. A Christian will often become one because of the power associated with its stance alone through friends, never really understanding the essence of the iteration of knowledge, and later, using emotions to hide the truth for fear of losing friendships and the false feeling of power.

Some clarifications:

Physical: Immanent is classified in all existence, something had to be prior for there to be remains. Physical represents part of the point, as in the Big Bang point, we observe from, only our organic point isn't as powerful, and needs spiritual enlightenment.

Materialism: The propagation of all plant and rock matter however converted chemically or genetically. Hydrogen and the presence of HO are inclusive at a very high percentage in the natural world even though the presence is often very small for HO.

Physicalism: Accepting immaterial or irrelevance in all context to the presence of another elevated dimension that contains a higher force whether connected to us or not and the spatiotemporal link [space and time] to registered awareness or empirical personal observation.

~~~~~~~

Immaterial: Not labeled important to material because material does matter as if, material is all that matters, and hiding this fact using immanent as imminent. If you want to remain, you must hurry and die, then you will live forever, but you are being given directions for a place no one can verify that the advise is valid. See discussion above clarifications.

Imminent: The projection of now, impending, about to occur, the mirror of awareness in depth.

1 John 3:8-10
He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. [9] Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. [10] In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

Comment: Notice the clever contrast between verse 8 and 9? Who is the brother or brethren? The immanence of the brother seed. Space dust that became life on Earth and every living soul matters. It would be against God to call someone a Christian or Pagan, as we are all in the same boat floating to the same source, or those who are aware of it. It would be a sin to forget the essence of our journey, and assume rule over others for worth of dignity who hold this true.

The pinnacle of supporting life on Earth and monitoring the environment in a metaphysics relationship that sustains life in axiom would be closer to God than anyone normally seems to get acquainted with. Those who remove life on Earth are in most cases too far gone mentally to realize they work against the power of God, even if it is a small rabbit gutted, or a bug they step on. Of course, it would seem, higher up the life scale, the more against the power of God would be realized, or manifested in the immaterial record of life, and the degree of worth for souls measured to attained knowledge, as knowledge, spirit, emotions, and love would all be important factors for God who may be holding the end of the hydrogen measuring stick.

Sustenance of this very system should also not be abused, as it is the source. Strangely, we as a human race to hell, have not considered that the universe is very life fragile, and we have only been here in our present state seemingly for a few thousand years. We treat the Earth as if it would last forever, and anyone who has thought it through knows better.

To create all that, let it die, and only save those who were unappreciative of it and wanted to die to be saved seems a waste. Anyone with a brain knows God is not that stupid.

R. Mark Sink  2007/12/31